I put an open call on Facebook asking, "
Commercial photographers- Are physical portfolios a thing of
the past? Is the iPad a suitable replacement? Do you still prefer to show
prints when possible? Please help me give my students the best and most up to
date information. Thanks!"
The response was significant. Photographers, art directors, photo editors, and graphic designers all tuned in and spoke up. It was a lively conversation. What is my conclusion? You can find it at the end, after you read the whole thread.
I've condensed and summarized some of the comments, so my apologies if anyone finds their thoughts removed.
Ben
Colman I believe both physical and electronic
portfolios are useful, as I tell my students. You need to do your homework
before presenting work, know your audience. What will reach your viewer best,
an elegant portfolio/book or the vibrance of an electronic presentation.
Matthew Jones
Check out my recent article on petapixel, and/or
FStoppers to spark some inspiration. Physical ports are still live and kickin!
Matthew Jones
http://petapixel.com/.../make-a-pocket-portfolio-for-a.../
Make a Pocket Portfolio for a Way to Stand Out When Out and
About
As a photographer, I’m constantly striving for new ways
to...
petapixel.com
http://petapixel.com/2015/03/06/make-a-pocket-portfolio-for-a-way-to-stand-out-when-out-and-about/
Judith
Pishnery I found people still like prints. AND
if you are meeting them in person, prints are good. Otherwise they can just
look at your website. An iPad portfolio is not that different from the website
James
Rajotte Print portfolios are a must for meetings
with editors in my experience.
Robert
Johnson Try a zine like mag cloud as well a nice
leave behind.
Jesse
JHutch Hutcheson I prefer a student bring me a
digital portfolio when applying for an internship. Just my personal preference.
Wendy
Marks I prefer actual prints and a face to face
meeting with the photographer when curating work for a gallery.
Stephen
Mallon No plastic sleeves. Have both, if the
work is going to the web its fine to see it on a screen. If you are trying to
get a print job, it’s good to see how it looks in paper. Update the print book
once a year, keep the iPad up to date
Dara
Dyer Sarah Silver (NY fashion photographer)
invests a lot into her specially printed portfolio AND promo cards. Apparently
messengers there still deliver physical portfolios because she advised me that
mine was too large and should be a suitable size for a messenger to carry.
Walter
Colley Just like there will never ever be a
replacement for the 8X10 chrome, there can be no equal to fine prints-well
presented. That said, I have told students & personally believe that iPads
are also a "good" alternative when talking cost and ease of use, etc.
Jim
Cavanaugh I just made a new print portfolio and
have been showing it around the last few weeks. Still an important part of the
process. The interaction is far more compelling than swiping by images on a screen.
Aaron
Ingrao The entire reason for having a physical
portfolio is for meetings. Since meetings are an important part of establishing
relationships, with potential clients, absolutely every photographer should
have a print portfolio. The impact of a well presented, large scale print
cannot be overestimated. An iPad can be taken along as a supplemental, but it's
not a substitute. The large scale portfolio, packaged well, presented well and dealt
with as fine art, shows a seriousness and care for production value and
presentation.
If I were a buyer and met with a photog who only had an iPad, no matter how awesome the images, I wouldn't take that photog very seriously. It's lazy.
If I were a buyer and met with a photog who only had an iPad, no matter how awesome the images, I wouldn't take that photog very seriously. It's lazy.
Roger
Bruce I do you agree with Wendy, but as Kevin
Kelly observes, New technology does not replace -- it piles on. The iPad can
make for an elegant presentation but its constraints of scale may compromise many
kinds of work.
Jim
Cavanaugh If I'm going anywhere where I may run
into clients, I bring my iPad with the portfolio on it. But for formal
meetings, always the print book.
Molly
McMullin Prints. I hate ipads.
Sara
Elder A couple of photographers have come to the office recently with
beautiful print portfolios. It was a pleasure looking at them.
Marjorie
Crum I'm seeing both iPad and print versions for
design students but I think most prefer decent prints, and not 8.5x11 size,
seeing it bigger is always better and that's where the iPad fails.
Scott
Hamilton iPad for video work. Custom book makers
are building iPad holder within a print box or book. Showing on a iPad can be
annoying but also can save you in a pinch of you haven't the time to insert a
series or piece within printed book. And good for showing maybe a experimental
direction or bunny trial that normally wouldn't fit within context of a printed
book. Also just because a new technology comes to be doesn't mean it makes
another obsolete it's all about zigging when everyone else is zagging.
W
Keith McManus I think a photographer would be
best served by having more than one method of presentation. Certainly a iPad
(or other tablet) would a good idea in this day and age. My experience as a
photographer and editor has been almost entirely in the editorial world and in
that environment a one-on-one approach can be the most effective.
Kendrick
Brinson Portfolio book. We bring an iPad with
our most recent work, too
Emily
Harris I've seen more and more people use
iPads...but I am still old school and like to show prints, but it is often
easier and quicker to show people work when you have it readily available on
hand
Gavin
Thomas The iPad is awesome because you can
update and customize your "book" more often and specifically to
different clients with a push of a button. Don't forget to have nice business
cards and promo pieces to leave behind!!
Aaron
Ingrao The name of that book maker Matthew Jones
posted about is https://www.mypublisher.com/photobooks/sizesandprices
Todd
Joyce Both. There's nothing like a big splash to
impress someone and an oversized book really is impressive. And making an
impression is why we're there. Each has its merits and as Emily says it's what
you have on hand. And you're not going to carry an oversized book every day
like you would an iPad. Depending on what work I was showing, if I were a
student, I would favor a book for those few big appointment opportunities and
carry an iPad for any chance/quick meetings. BTW, using an iPad at a shoot to
show current clients recent work, is a great way to get more/new types of work
from existing clients.
John
Robert Brown I would prefer you share photos
electronically for first blush, and then show me a few large key prints if you
wish. But for the most part, well-saved digital shots are most appreciated by
me.
Scott
Hamilton Yea John Robert Brown . I often assemble custom
electronic PDF portfolios after initial conversations. I have a templated
Indesign doc that I use to arrange then output. also at the point of my website
I can create a custom PDF. Which reminds me to say that the website is the most
important element in my mind, over iPad or printed book portfolio.
Jamey
Stillings I have not been asked for a commercial
print portfolio for a few years. We usually create custom electronic ones for
prospective clients. In the art / documentary world, I always start with prints
and only rarely go electronic on first face to face meetings.
Aaron
Smith I do a new book at least twice a year and
then iPad for all the new work. My reps still like doing physical books and
physical mailers!
Timothy
Archibald Hey there- the iPad makes for easy
updating , but the viewer just rips thru those images very very quickly. Makes
all my life work suddenly get reduced to some anecdotal clickbate. I use a
book, 13 x 19 horizontal pages printed on Moab Entrada thick and tangible
watercolor paper.
Grant
Taylor Morning, Forest! For some time, I've been
showing prints on 13 x 19 paper, (12 x 18 image area,) when meeting
face-to-face with potential clients. The art directors really seem to enjoy the
tactile process of leafing through them, and also love the size of the image. I
haven't used a book for probably 4 years. The large prints are super, as long
as you have the table space to play with. I'll also create electronic
portfolios for specific requests, and yes, the web site is important. (Trying
to develop a new one now!) While I understand the merit of an iPad, I
personally wouldn't choose it over large, gorgeous prints unless the situation
made the showing of prints inconvenient.
Anne Esse
Hi Forest! While a website is the first place I go
to view work for a shooter I'm considering, I love the oversize prints (like
Grant described) when viewing work in person. If we need to jump on an iPad to
see more examples that are relevant to the discussion that's very okay too.
Jonathan
Rutherford Forest! I believe it is still
important to present a traditional portfolio, especially when the potential job
has a printed output. When I have a face to face review, I bring a traditional
printed portfolio, an iPad portfolio, and a small printed portfolio to leave
behind. (I just started using the 'book' function in Lightroom - printing with
Blurb. I will send you my latest one) I have been loading my iPad with
additional work that is not in my printed book. These images are usually
specific to the client. I also add 'tears' to the end of the presentation if it
is appropriate. My last thought on the printed portfolio: Even if a client isn't
specifically requesting a traditional book, why wouldn't you present them with
one? Imagine how may digital images a photo editor or art director consumes in
one day. As humans we are inherently tactile, and by presenting work in a
tactile fashion, I believe it makes your work more memorable and makes a
greater impact. Lastly, a week after a meeting or portfolio review, I will
follow up with a promo card and thank you note.
Rob Neiler
I’d say 90% of the designer portfolios that I see
are digital. When we present concepts to clients I prefer boards (I like the
interactive nature of holding the work and passing it around the room).
The photography portfolios I see are still printed boards by a big majority. I think the printed boards work for photographers the same way. The prints are passed around the room and evoke more conversation. For some reason the digital counterparts seem to get less discussion. Less interactivity, less theater, less personal.
The photography portfolios I see are still printed boards by a big majority. I think the printed boards work for photographers the same way. The prints are passed around the room and evoke more conversation. For some reason the digital counterparts seem to get less discussion. Less interactivity, less theater, less personal.
Wayne
Calabrese Hey Pal, clients still love the
tactile experience of looking through a print portfolio. I feel it slows down
the interview process and gives the artist and buyer time to connect as 2
people who may eventually spend time in a foxhole together. Showing work in print
form is usually the 2nd or 3rd step in the sales process, after viewing a web
site or iPad presentation. So by the time you are actually face to face, it's
nice to have a different media to share your work. Actually, it's very Italian,
you never show up at someone's home without some special goodies to share.
John
Neel An iPad or laptop doesn't represent scale
or intimacy. There is no surface or tactility. The presentation is cold and
distant. Everything is less remarkable. Likewise, a poor presentation of prints
can undermine the experience. I would take a selection of my better works as
prints along with a well thought out presentation to show electronically on a
tablet.
Josanne
DeNatale Hi Forest. I'm in agreement with
several other posts, with a preference for prints because they encourage more
interaction and conversation. It's cumbersome to pass around a device, it might
fade to black, and you lose one image as soon as you move to the next one.
Prints can be spread out and passed around, which results in a more connective
conversation. And that is what will make me remember someone. I seldom remember
the images that swiped past my eyes on a small screen. I still will refer to
website before/after the meeting, and if there is an image I really like, I
will print it out and tape to my wall. I like to stare at powerful images.
Billy
Howard I've used an online portfolio since
before online was cool, It works with my clients and my niche, but I know a lot
of advertising agencies and magazines like physical portfolios....so, it
depends on your market. I will admit, there is something to actually holding a
portfolio book and there are so many options for designing them that really
show off your work....There is my non-answer.
Robbie
McClaran I still prefer to show printed work. To
my mind, that's what makes it a photograph, a 2 dimensional object, and while
images on a screen certainly can look nice, there is no substitute for a good
print. I have to admit, I don't get the opportunity to show printed work as
often as I would prefer, but I do keep an updated printed portfolio at the
ready. And FWIW, I show prints either bound in book form, similar to what some
others described, as well as individual prints in a nice box.
Richard
Kelly I like both depends a great deal on the
reason for the presentation. I find that designers - I work with graphic design
firms a lot. Really like a well designed and printed portfolio, unless the
project is e-based. I've had photo editors react enthusiastically to a printed
book as well. Especially if looking at a Personal project. I like the iPad for
spontaneous meet ups and clients looking for quick updates on recent work. Forest McMullin this is a wonderful topic
thanks for posting.
Nancy
Newberry Always prints here
Molly
Roberts Hi Forest, for the most part I am happy
to look at portfolios on iPad. But it's also really fun to see handmade books
or prints if that's how the photographer intends for the work to be seen.
Billy
Howard Even if you have a print/book version of
your portfolio, it would be impossible to have the reach you have with an
online portfolio. For those who have both they can target their most desirable
clients with the physical book and reach a broader audience with the online
portfolio.
Michael
Weschler We're seeing that art
buyers largely still want to see a print book occasionally. When it comes to
editorial & advertising, they like having the confidence that your work
doesn't just look good on a screen. Print is a higher standard and if you're
expected to deliver visual assets not only for Digital, you should also expect
to be asked to show examples first. For example, our New York chapter has three
portfolio reviews per year & screens are not welcome: Fine Art, Commercial
& Student. Incidentally, this is a free benefit with membership which more
than covers your annual dues. www.asmp.org
Debbie
Weiss Benkovich Hi Forest. I would say large
printouts are really nice to view and I find us art directors do take more time
with the prints over the iPad. Websites are really important to review
photographers that I'm not familiar with.
James
Wondrack My $.02: Consider the audience and
ultimate placement of the images. We may all like to look at big prints, but if
the gig is for digital use, I'd prefer to see how well a photographer can shoot
for screen use and for potentially smaller sizes.
There you have it. Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion. Let's do it again some day!